Harish Chandra Tantwai v. State of M.P.) & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. K.K.Choubey, Engineer, Officiating Executive Superintehding Engineer, Public Division Health Engineering (Circle), Raipur, C.G. Oi^. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.S.No. 5091/2005'' (Narish ChandraTantwai Vs. State of M.P. and others) TheApplicant named above begs to submit as under: IC—78 -V 3:5q'B(TqT?Pf.S?WTS, Rl^iy^ •KWW Wtp^R MC.C «K> <s^l'^'/('…
Judgment
Harish Chandra Tantwai, S/o Late Sri Har Prasad Tanhwai, aged Executive years, Engineer, P.H.E. Projecf, Division Bastar, Jagdalpur, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh State District 57 VERSUS Madhya ^Pradesh, State Through: the Secretary, Public Vallabh Engineering, Health Ghawan, Bhopal (M.P.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: health The Secretary, Public Engineering, Raipur (C.G.)
P.N. Mayaskar, Executive Ehgineer, Office of Chief Engineer, Health Engineering Dept. Raipur, C.G. Public ,•—»'" R.N. Konher, Engineer, Officiating Executive under Secretary (Technical) Public Health Engineering Department, Raipur, C.G.
K.K.Choubey, Engineer, Officiating Executive Superintehding Engineer, Public Division Health Engineering (Circle), Raipur, C.G. Oi^. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.S.No. 5091/2005'' (Narish ChandraTantwai Vs. State of M.P. and others) TheApplicant named above begs to submit as under: IC—78 -V 3:5q'B(TqT?Pf.S?WTS, Rl^iy^ •KWW Wtp^R MC.C «K> <s^l'^'/(' Wf 20 W^yr <raai ipit^ii(<^tt) i SV^S W ft-li'b Wff 311^1 **»*' •CTmw •afw<nw?i ^N?pft:l WIcff <i fest'rfSR^R ^T3llWI^IK?I S.B: HON'BLEJUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER Shri AK. Prasad, counst ii for the appllcant. Shri B. Payashi, PLfortl :he State. Heard. This is an applicatio(i restoration of W.P.(S) No. --(S 5091/2005 which ^as disrr)i prosecution vide order dated ?l Thi^ is not opposed by For the reasons menti4 for want of fissed by this Court $6.04.2012. <he counsel for the State. (ne<^ jn the app!ication»the same is aliowed. Accordingly, M.C.C. Nj) No. 5091/2005 is restored to ils ^.517/2012 is allowed and W.P.(S) is-original number. Priya ¥ti»sker !d^^ 3ud%e
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.