H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT v. M/s
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Judgment
SINGLE BENCH : HOM'BLE SHRi PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA. J. PETSTIONER M/s. J.K. Lakshmi Cement Ltd. M/s GMR Chhattisgarh Energy Uci. others. snn 8.P. Mishra, counsel for petrtioner. Shri Amrito Das, counssl for respondsnt No. "Sft»*<S % Foilowing ora! Court was passed Prashant Kumar Mishra, Respondent No.1 has moved an applicaflon for dismissal of the writ petition with the following averments:- "2. That during S» pen^ncy of respondent No.1 m e partjes, haw sought te w-royte wy diffe nces ff?e nd lay ffieir vanted to fte ^tjttoner.
T'nat !n wew of the -roating hewng heing done by respondent No. 1. Swre is no reason forsny raised by fte peWoner and in fact the peWoner represfftfe&Ves have also wsited Ihe site to look fw the locafion of the pmposed towers. in light of ffiie said devetopment fhere is nwther any difference fcefryeen t'ne parSes nor any dispute pending for adjudicaSQn before Ws Hon'ble Courf. The nwv mute pRiposed for erecSon of the transmisston towers are oute/cfe (ft®
That in i'lght of subseauwt Q'evetopment !s v 'Ss-i \. ia ^. ^-sa sr^s.. A£fb ? Jti ^- Hon'bte Court •xyne infriictueiis. Thek 7'ft/e Coyrf ha.s- &ewme may be dismissed. " s ^.' The appiication Is supp an affiaa' signatory of respondent No.1. In vi©wof the submission made and particuiarty for e reason that the respondent No.1 shail not use the area for which minera! concession has been ailowed in favour of the petitioner, the writ petition has been The writ to the petitioner to file afresh if occsision so in future. \^ Sd;- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge f:
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.