Goverdhan Prasad Yadu v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secr-etary Departftient of Panchayat 8s Rural Development, Mantralaya, Raipur Distriet- Raipur (CG.)
The Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Board Office Raipur (C.G.)
The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhura District-Gariyaband (C.G.)
District Project Coordinator, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District- Gariyaband (C.G.)
Block Education Officer, Chhura Tribal Block Development District-Gariyaband (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : -^ As mentioned above in the Cause Title.
SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. W.P.(S) No. 4331 of 2013 PETITIONER Goverdhan Prasad Yadu. Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Jitendra Nande, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Adil Minhaj, PL for the State, on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20/12/2013) The order under challenge whereby petitioner has been suspended, is appealable under Rule 13 of Chhattisgarh Teacher (Panchayat) Cadre (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules,,2012.
2. In view of the availability of alternative. remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with a direction that in the event petitioner submits duly constituted appeal before the Appellate Authority within a period of 15 days from today, the said Appellate Authority shall consider and decide the same as early as possible and preferably within a period of one month from the date of submission of appeal. c— _————-—s"""' 'S.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.