✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Judgment · High Court

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Additional Secretary. State of / Chhattisgarh. Pashudhan DevelQpment Department, Mantralaya, AAahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.6.) Dr.D.tS. Jhariya, &irectQrat®, Veterinary Heatth Servtces, Raipur, bistrict Raipyr (C6) •-^sy '<<. WRIT PETITCON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITCTUTEON OF INblA 'S CCrtJRTOF CHHATTISGARH AT .3i…

Judgment

Shri Sushi! Kumar Shukla, R/o. Shanternagar, Behinct Tiwari Nursing Homs. Mahasqmjjnd, .g . (na.i-ll S 4/yiu'fMO -P<>-sl-»^1cy '"^^, t>istrict Mahasamund (C6) ESPON&6NTS

1.

State of ChhQttisgaph through the Secretary, Pashudhan Development E)epartment, AAantrotQya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, bistt. Raipur

2.

Additional Secretary. State of / Chhattisgarh. Pashudhan DevelQpment Department, Mantralaya, AAahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur. Distt. Raipur (C.6.) Dr.D.tS. Jhariya, &irectQrat®, Veterinary Heatth Servtces, Raipur, bistrict Raipyr (C6) •-^sy '<<. WRIT PETITCON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITCTUTEON OF INblA 'S CCrtJRTOF CHHATTISGARH AT .3i, le Shri Irit Petitbn (8) No. 470/2013 PETIT10NER w. Itate of Chhattisgarh and others Shri Sunii Sahu, counsel forfhe petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the State. 3RAL ORDER (22.02.2013) After srgulng for some time, leam&d counsei for the petftioner would submit that for the present, the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a representstlQ.n before the competent authority chailenging the transfer order Annexure P-1 by which he has been transferred from the post of Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Mahassmund to the post of Principal Assistant Veterinar/ Fleid Officer, Training Centre, fctehasamund. (2) ln view of the prayer msde, the writ p-eStion is disposed of with a direcBon that if the petitioner subroits a rfipresenation before the competent authority wlthin a period of two weeks from today, the concemed authority shail declde the representatton as eariy as possibte and preferably within a period of 8 weete thsreafter. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments