✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Judgment · High Court

N K AGRAWAI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Wife oflate Shri S.K. Thaltur, Aged about 50 years, PresenUy posted as Legal Aid Officer, Civil Court premises, Kanker (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, 1. throu^i Principal Secretary Law and Legal Affairs, D:|C;S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(C.a) Chhattisgarh Rajya Vidhik Sewa Pradhikaran, throu^i Principal Secretary Durg (C.G.) Chhattisgarh Rajya Vidhik Sewa Pradhikaran throu^i Principal Secretary, Bilaspur (C.G.) Madhya Pradesh Rajya Vidhik Sewa Pradhikaran, 574, South Civi! Lines Jabalpur (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 228/22r6F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF \VRIT IN THE NATLTRE OF MA^'DAMU8, CERETIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT The petitioner most respectfally submits as under:- -^ 'i ^ %•f^S. ^^ XI-BC—' wn sn^i giiiw % . ^=T •^!iAis(t4, 'yfllyie, ?s|<niy^< ...u.}.-.t-..3.6.o^.Q^............ >.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. M 27.11.2013 garwal Shri Sfaashank Thakur, A.dv< Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Law\ Shri Ashish Shrivastava. Ad •liiii )r Advoca.ie B^respondent No.4. ^cate for the petitioner. ter for the State. ^yocate for respondent No. 2 & 3. |ocate with Ms. Mukta Tripathi, Bv way bfthis petition, the salary commencing ti-om June, petitioaer is seeking arrears of her 1999 to January, 2000, with a!! * .; -' •• ••"• consequential benefits and interest Leamed cpunsel appearin^ for the parties submit that this petition may be disposed of dire| decide the petitioner's representatil Prayer appears to be reasori^ Accordingly, the writ petitij files detailed representation withii1| the same shall be decided by th^ possible preierably within a per^ receiot ofcopvofthis order. bting the respondent authorities to -V .ble and is allowed. m is disposed of If the petitioner a period of one month from today, respondent authorities as early as bd of 3 months from the date of Sd/- N.K.AgrawaI Judge Saiiu/'ashil

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments