Anjani Kumar Pandey v. ORAL ORDER
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Sahu Sd/- N.K. Agrawai Judge ^
Judgment
Anjani Kumar Pandey, Aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Babulal Pandey, R/o Village barripara, Konhargarh, Janpad Panchayat Pamgarh, Civil & Revenue District - Janjgir Champa-(C.&.) Rajpal Singh Tyagi, The Collector Cum Mission Director, Rajiv Sandhi Siksha Mission, Janjgir Champa, Distt. Janjgir Champa-(C.6.) CONTEMPT PETETTON UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEAAPT OF COURTS ACT REA& WITH ARTCCLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (Civil) No. 323 of2013 PETITIONER : AnjaaiKumarPaiidey VERSUS RESPONDENT : Rajpal Singh Tyagi fContempt Case under Section 12 ofthe Contempt of Courts Act) fSingle Bench: Hon'We Mr. N.K. Agarwal, J.) Present : Sfari Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20.06.2013)
Alleging that the respondent has not complied with the orders and directions issued by this oourt in Writ Appeal No. 51 of 2008 dated 17.01.2013, the complainant is before this court in tfais
Vide order dated 17.01.2013, Division Bench of this court directed the respondent to decide the representation which may be filed by the petitioner within a period ofthree months from the •• . !. i' 1; i, .ofreceipt ofrepresentation. Admittedly, the decision which was required to be taken by the respondent pursuant to the above order has already been taken by the respondent by rejecting the representation filed by the petitioner, and thus, the respondent has substantially complied tfae order passed by this court. -'.^^y'^^s^ ^-vss^
In view ofthe fact tfaat respondent has substentially eomplied the order ofthis court, I do not find any reason to proceed farther in tfae matter initiating contem.pt proceeding against the respoadeat. However, the petitioner is free to avail appropriate remedy wluch may be available to him uader the provisions oflaw.
Operative part
Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. Sahu Sd/- N.K. Agrawai Judge ^
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India; Contempt ofCourts Act — s. 12.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.