Smt. Krlshna Bal v. Rs-ii* TOT^iI^T **<!<*> ^aiwdfttt <fflt?r tft1<<fCT^tt1 TTTO^f ^ ^t^ ^^K ^affiroan^i S.B
Judgment
Smt. Krlshna Bal. D/o Mannulal resldent of vftlage & Post Sen, District PotiyadjK, Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) Tehsi! WRTTPETITIOWUNDERA«TICt.E2Z»/3i2»OFCONSTITUTlON OFINDIA -^, ;:::lrf&<^ -y"' ^ '3'^ •^wm<i, w^\w\<a, hv\\^< r>M6^fo3 *<iiCTr a»*<i<t» ^ 20 3iI^5T 'V^! ('jqi^'i^r) sii^y vs Rs-ii* TOT^iI^T **<!<*> ^aiwdfttt <fflt?r tft1<<fCT^tt1 TTTO^f ^ ^t^ ^^K ^affiroan^i S.B. Hon'ble ShriJustice N.K. htgarwal Shri SP Kale, Deputy Adv Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Adv! 4cate General tor the petitioner/State. ^cate for the respondent. Shri Kale submits that ami ^unt of gratuity has already been paid to the respondent. In view of fact that amout tfae respondent, nothing survives Accordingly, the petitio! inlhictuoiis. No order as to costs ijt of gratuity has already besn paid to (n this petition. is dismissed as having become Consequently, M(W)P No: P263/03 also stands disposed of. Sd/- N.K.AgrawaI Judge Sahu *3 !|lltl<(l<lilsl)l 1i;"lli!UI, (W4ic;'lT<l —ES/48—8/2012—80,000.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.