✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Amit Ghosh v. SB:- HON. SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J

N K AGRAWAI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

In view of above, the petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the

Judgment

S/o Late Shri S.N. Ghosh Head Master, Govt. Middle School AtariaBazar, Block Khairagarh District Raj nandgaon (C. G.) .%^.^ ^•^o^ ^y^'-y VERSUS RESPONDENTS

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of School Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipiu-(C.G.) -2. Director Directorate of Publiclnstitutions. Pensioh Bada Raipur(C.G.) /' 3. DistrictEducationOfficer /^^K^^ (ChhattiSi ^ Distriet Rajtiandgaon ^^i^"» PETmONl UNDER ARTI©EE226 OF I'HB.iBQNSTn'UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCES MP »PPR@Bia»TE SWRITS OF MANDAMUS ANS CSmVSSe&^ f^EWQ^O^^ WRITSANDDIRECTIONS:- I % •-<. ilLyJ.iJ, 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (8) No.5490 of 2005 Petitioner : Amit Ghosh Versus RESPONDENTS : . State of Chhattisgarh and others. SB:- HON. SHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J. PRESENT :- Shri Varun Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.P.Kale, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passedon 27.09.2013)

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote him on the post of Lecturerw.e.f. 17.08.1998. .

2.

submits that Shri Varun Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the petitioner's juniors have .been given promotion w.e.f. 17.08.1998 whereas without any rhyme or reason the petitioner has been given promotion to the post of Lecturer w.e.f. 31.07.2006. He further submits that this petition may be disposed of directing the respondent- authorities that if the petitioner files a fresh representation before them, then the same shall. be considered by the respQndent-authorities in accordance with law.

3.

Learned State Counsel does not Oppose the above submission.

Operative part

4.

respondents that In view of above, the petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the if the petitioner files a fresh representation within a period of one month. from today before respondents, the same shall be in accordance with law on its own merits, considered by them, expeditiously. Sd/- N.K.AgrawaI Judge jsf'

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments