RT OF CHHA'ETISGARH AT BILAEPUR (C.G.) v. R^S
Judgment
S.B.: Hon'ble Mr. Justtce N.K. Atsawal
17.10.2013 None for the petitionejr. Mr. A.V. Sridhar, Panjel Siace fhere is no r< petitioner even ia two rou|ads other option except to dis ^l Lawyer for the State. ^presentatiou on behalf of the ^ids, fhis Court is left with no |miss fhis petition for want of prosecution. Accordiagly, fhe pe1 prosecution. No order as to| ition is dismissed for waut of cost(s). r Sd/- N.K.AgrawaI Judge /hr-y ^lltl^^l^lflyil^, <l^-lf^U<t —FS/48—8/2012—80,000. ^^
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments