Sukai Ram v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh Mr. Shyama Kant Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.A. Alam (SC)C Mr. Ganpati Trivedi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
28-10-2013 Learned counsel for the parties are present. This writ application is directed against the order dated
22.09.2001 passed by the Member, Board of Revenue in Revision Case No. 35 of 1999, whereby the Member, Board of Revenue while setting aside the appellate order passed by the Additional Collector has upheld the order of the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms passed in exercise of powers vested under Section 16(3) Patna High Court CWJC No.766 of 2003 (7) dt.28-10-2013 2 of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961. The dispute raised is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Bihar Land Tribunal constituted under Section 4 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) and the rules framed thereunder. In view of the provisions of Section 9 and Section 9 of the Act read with Rule 5(6) of the Bihar Land Tribunal Rules, 2010, the records of the writ proceedings stands transferred / remitted to the Bihar Land Tribunal for adjudication. The Registry is directed to transfer the records within four weeks from today. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land Act, 1961; Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 — s. 4.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 28 Oct 2013. The bench was JYOTI SARAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.