Krishna Nandan Roy v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 1111. 01-04-2013 Heard learned counsel the petitioners, learned A.C. to Government Pleader No. 26 as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondent(s). The present writ petition is in relation to a dispute under the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 (in short ‘B.T.Act’), particularly…
Judgment
.... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mr. Anjani Kr.Sharan For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP-26) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
01-04-2013 Heard learned counsel the petitioners, learned A.C. to Government Pleader No. 26 as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondent(s). The present writ petition is in relation to a dispute under the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 (in short ‘B.T.Act’), particularly; under Section 48D of the B.T.Act. During the pendency of the present writ petition for 2 Patna High Court CWJC No.12582 of 2004 (11) dt.01-04-2013 adjudication of such dispute, an appropriate forum has already been constituted as ‘Land Tribunal’, under the provisions of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion that this matter can well be adjudicated by the Land Tribunal. In view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, the Registry is directed to transmit the record to the Tribunal forthwith. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885; Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 — s. 15.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 01 Apr 2013. The bench was RAKESH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.