Tinku Kumar @ Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner For the Opposite Party : Mr. H.A. Khan, (APP). ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate. ORAL ORDER 2 19-11-2013 The petitioner is permitted to delete the opposite party no. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 498 (A), 496, 406 and some other Sections of the IPC. The petitioner husband complainant/informant and it has been alleged that he along with others have committed various tortures upon his wife. Submission is that the petitioner is in custody since
18.07.2013 and other accused persons namely Ashok Prasad and Mani Devi have already enlarged on bail by the court below. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47785 of 2013 (2) dt.19-11-2013 2 the petitioner Tinku Kumar @ Manish Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Md. Javed Alam, the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna in connection with Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 66 of
2013. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) KKSINHA/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.