Mukesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 399, 402
- Arms Act, 1959
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2013 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 05.01.2013 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. On information that the accused persons are preparing to commit dacoity, a raid was led when four persons were apprehended and from possession of petitioner no.1, one country made loaded pistol and mobile were recovered when from possession of petitioner no. 2, one live cartridge and one Bhujali (sharp cutting weapon) were recovered. A statement has been made in paragraph no. 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of recovery and period under custody, let the petitioners, above named, be 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24991 of 2013 (2) dt.22-07-2013 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Patna, in connection with S. Tr. No. 393 of 2013. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.