✦ Patna High Court

Ram Krishna Chaudhary v. Sita Devi

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The Civil Revision application stands allowed

Judgment

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER

#07. 09-08-2012 Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shri Prakash Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties are present. This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated

17.01.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division-2nd , Samastipur in Title Suit No. 6 of 2008, whereby on a petition filed on behalf of the opposite parties, the learned court below has held the suit having abated in terms of Section 4(C ) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 . A supplementary affidavit has been filed today enclosing an information provided by the Department of Revenue and Land Patna High Court C.R. No.261 of 2009 (7) dt.09-08-2012 2 Reforms, Government of Bihar under the Right to Information Act and whereunder it has been mentioned that no consolidation proceedings is continuing at Mauza Laguniya Raghukanth, P.S. 195, Circle-Samastipur, District-Samastipur. Learned counsel thus submits that in view of the said position the order impugned cannot be sustained. The position is admitted by learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties. In the result, the order impugned dated 17.01.2009 is quashed and set aside. As the suit is of the year 2008, learned Trial court would consider and dispose of the suit expeditiously and in accordance with law. The Civil Revision application stands allowed. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Civil Revision application stands allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 — s. 4(C); Right to Information Act, 2005.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 261 of 2009). ← Search more judgments