✦ Patna High Court

Seikh Sanful v. The State Of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30892 of 2011MANDHATA SINGH

Case at a glance

Bench
MANDHATA SINGH

Judgment

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-10-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The points taken in the quashing petition may be raised at appropriate stage before the trial court. With the aforesaid liberty this application stands

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30892 of 2011). ← Search more judgments