Md. Murshid Alam @ Md. Murshid Aalam v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. vinayak/- U T (Rajiv Roy, J)
Judgment
Mr. Keshab Raj, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP For the State ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY 2 08-04-2026 Heard the parties. ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Special N.D.P.S. Case No. 27 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(ii)(b) and (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, lodged on 06.07.2021.
As per the prosecution story, the Police on secret information, intercepted a vehicle and there is recovery/seizure of 330 Kg Ganja. This led to the F.I.R..
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the vehicle belongs to him, it was actually sold and he do not have criminal antecedent.
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP on the other hand submitted that not only he owns the vehicle, there is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20764 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 huge recovery of 330 Kg Ganja.
Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the recovery that has been recorded in the F.I.R., no case of anticipatory bail is made out.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. vinayak/- U T (Rajiv Roy, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.