VEMANAPALLI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO v. REVENUE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
#1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA AND REVENUE SECRETARIAT AMARAVATHI. 2. (STAMPS BUILDINGS, IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, REGISTRATION) SECRETARIAT,
#2. SRI NISHANT KUMAR IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 3.
#3. SRI K KISHORE KUMAR REDDY, TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 4.RICT
#4. SRI A VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, DISTRICT REGISTRAR (STAMPS REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT ANNAMAYYA DIST
#5. SRI GURUSWAMY, JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR, MADANAPALLI ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 6.
#6. SRI RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI VIJAYAWADA , A.P. 7.
#7. SMT K SATYAVATI, SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND PROTECTION CELL ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT MZ-II, TIRUPATHI. 8.
#8. SRI C VISWANATH, DISTRICT ENDOWMENT OFFICER, 2 ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for will full violation of the orders of this Honble Court passed by her Lordship SRI JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA in WP No. 9092 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
#1. S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
#1. NAGARAJU NAGURU The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri S.Syamsunder Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner.
#2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of this Court in W.P.No.9092 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025 has been complied with by the respondents.
#3. Having regard to the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Dated: 23.01.2026 ANI ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA 3 234 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3276/2025 Dated: 23.01.2026 ANI
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jan 2026. The bench was KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, KIRANMAYEE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.