D. Jayalaxmi v. Mr. Rajeshwari Tiwari, The District Collector, Hyderabad District, at
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 ss. 10, 12
Judgment
MONDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1211 of 2003 (Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents in violating the orders passed in WP. MP. No. 25560 of 2003 in W.P. No. 20420 of 2003 dated: 25-09-2003) CONTEMPT CASE No. 1211 of 2003 Between:
1. D. Jayalaxmi.
2. K. Lakshmi Bai.
3. K. Suneetha.
4. K. Mallamma.
5. J. Yeshoda.
6. B. Padma.
7. S. Yadamma.
8. N. Mallaiah.
9. V. Narender.
10. S. Laxmi.
11. D. Murali.
12. N. Narasamma.
13. K. Anjaliamma.
14. A. Yadagiri.
15. A. Parvathamma.. (All are residents of Gandhi Colony, Scheduled Case & Backward Classes, Behind Y.W.C.A. Picket, Secunderabad) .. Petitioners AND
Mr. Rajeshwari Tiwari, The District Collector, Hyderabad District, at Hyderabad.
Mr. Venkateswar Reddy, The District Manager, Housing Cell, District Collectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. .. Respondents The Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 15-10-2003 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Jagadish Chandra Prasad, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr. V. Ch. Naidu, Advocate for the respondent No. 2, the Court made the following ORDER:
In view of the facts stated in the counter affidavit filed by respondent No. 2, the order dated: 15-10-2003 is modified to the extent that it shall be open to the respondents to proceed with the construction in respect of beneficiaries who have already given consent for the reduction of the extent. Post on 15-12-2003
. DEPUTY REGISTRAR // True copy// SECTION OFFICER To
1. Mr. Rajeshwari Tiwari, The District Collector, Hyderabad District, at Hyderabad.
2. Mr. Venkateswar Reddy, The District Manager, Housing Cell, District Collectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. (1 & 2 BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy of petition and affidavit)
One spare copy. Ksv Ksv Date of drafting: 10-12-2003 HIGH COURT LNRJ DATE: 08-12-2003 NOTE: POST ON 15-12-2003 C.C. NO. 1211 OF 2003 DIRECTION
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — ss. 10, 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 22 Dec 2003.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.