Code of Criminal Procedure — Section 126
Procedure. (1) Proceedings under section 125 may be taken
126.Procedure. (1) Proceedings under section 125 may be taken against any person in any district-
(a) where he is, or
(b) where he or his wife, resides, or
(c) where he last resided with his wife, or as the case may be, with the mother of the illegitimate child.
(2) All evidence in such proceedings shall be taken in the presence of the person against whom an order for payment of maintenance is proceed to be made, or, when his personal attendance is dispensed with, in the presence of his pleader, and shall be recorded in the manner prescribed for summons-cases:
Provided that if the Magistrate is satisfied that the person against whom an order for payment of maintenance is proposed to be made is wilfully avoiding service, or wilfully neglecting to attend the Court, the Magistrate may proceed to hear and determine the case ex parte and any order so made may be set aside for good cause shown on an application made within three months from the date thereof subject to such terms including terms at to payment of costs to the opposite party as the Magistrate may think just and proper.
(3) The Court in dealing with applications under section 125 shall have power to make such order as to costs as may be just.
867
127.
Alteration in allowance.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 126
- Irfan Ahmad Kuttay v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.
- Judgment · High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh · 2026
- Ankur v. Sakshi Gupta
- Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
- Chandan Kumar Sahoo & Ors. v. None
- Yawar Majeed Laloo v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir
- PYNENI SIVANNARAYANA v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- Pallavi Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Another
- Sharik Ahmad Bangroo v. Union Territory of J&K
- Nandkumar Patre v. Sumit Shrivastava
- Iswar Verma v. Mrs. Madhu Verma
- BIKKY CHAUDHARY v. SMTI RANI KUMARI GUPTA
- Supreme Court · 2026
- SHAIK KHAJAJI BEG @ S.K. KHAJA BEG v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- Vijay Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another
- Mithilesh Mishra State Of U.P. And 3 Others v. .....Revisionist(s)
- Smt Poonam @ Padma v. State of U.P. & Ors
- Sachin Kumar v. State Of U.P.
- Dr. Amaresh Bhowmik v. Mukta Begam & Ors
- SAMIR HALDER v. Mr. Jayanta Banerjee & Ors.
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.