Code of Criminal Procedure — Section 1
Ins. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 29 (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
1. Ins. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 29 (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
156
(b) in the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when
compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court;
(c) when any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death;
(d) when any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto.
(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal no such payment shall be made before the period
allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal.
(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced.
(4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of
Session when exercising its powers of revision.
(5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court
shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.
STATE AMENDMENTS
Karnataka
Amendments of section 357. — In section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974).—
(1) In section 357, in sub-section (1), after the words “the Court may” the brackets, figures and words “and where the person against whom an offence is committed belongs to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe as defined in clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution and the accused person doesn’t belong to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe the Court shall”, shall be inserted:
(2) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
“(3) When a Court imposes a sentence of which the fine does not form a part, the Court may, and where a person against whom an offence is committed belongs to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe as defined in clauses (24) and (25) of article 366 of the Constitution and the accused person does not belong to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe, the Court shall, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced”.
[Vide Karnataka Act 27 of 1987, s. 2].
Madhya Pradesh Amendment of section 357.—In section 357 of the Principal Act, —
(i) In sub-section (1), for the brackets, figure and words “(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine
157
or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied” the brackets, figure and words “(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, and where a person against whom an offence is committed belongs to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes as defined in clauses (24) and (25) and of Article 366 of the Constitution except when both the accused person and the person against whom an offence is committed belong cither to such Castes or Tribes, the Court shall, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied—”shall be substituted; and
(ii) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
“(3) When Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, and where a person against whom an offence is committed belongs to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes as defined in clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution, the Court shall when passing judgment order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced:
“Provided that the Court may not order the accused person to pay by way of compensation any amount if both the accused person and the person against whom an offence is committed belong either to the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes.”
[Vide Madhya Pradesh Act 29 of 1978, s. 3.]
West Bengal
In section 357 of the principal Act,—
(a) In sub-section (1), for the words and brackets “When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence including a (sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied—”, the words and brackets “When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, and where the person against whom an offence has been committed belongs to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, except when both the accused person and the person against whom an offence has been committed belong either to Scheduled Castes or to Scheduled Tribes shall, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied—” shall be substituted;
(b) for sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:—
“(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, and where the person against whom an offence has been committed belongs to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, shall, when passing judgment order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced:
Provided that the Court may not order the accused person to pay by way of compensation, any amount if both the accused person and the person against whom an offence has been committed belong either to Scheduled Castes or to Scheduled Tribes.”;
(c) after sub-section (5), the following Explanation shall be inserted:—
‘Explanation.—For the purposes of the section the expression “Scheduled Castes” and “Scheduled Tribes” shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them in clauses (24) and (25) of Article 366 of the Constitution of India.’.
[Vide West Bengal Act 33 of 1985, s. 3.]
158
1[357A. Victim compensation scheme.—(1) Every State Government in co-ordination with the Central Government shall prepare a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependents who have suffered loss or injury as a result of the crime and who require rehabilitation.
(2) Whenever a recommendation is made by the Court for compensation, the District Legal Service Authority or the State Legal Service Authority, as the case may be, shall decide the quantum of compensation to be awarded under the scheme referred to in sub-section (1).
(3) If the trial Court, at the conclusion of the trial, is satisfied, that the compensation awarded under section 357 is not adequate for such rehabilitation, or where the cases end in acquittal or discharge and the victim has to be rehabilitated, it may make recommendation for compensati
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 1
- Versus & Ors. v. COCP-885-2010 SANSAR DEVI @ SANSAR BALA SANSAR DEVI & Ors.
- RAJWINDER SINGH @ PRABHU HALWAI & Anr. v. STATE OF PUNJAB & Ors.
- ASSADUL ISLAM ALIAS ASADUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
- KARAMVEER v. STATE OF HARYANA & Anr.
- ASHABUL HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
- MODON URANG v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
- Bhagwan Singh alias Bhana v. State of Punjab & Ors.
- ANANTHA CHANDRA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
- SRI DHAJEN CHIRING ALIAS GOGOI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
- JAGADISH R v. SRI B S RAVI
- Muthukumar v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Parthibanoor Police Station, Ramanathapuram District
- DEVENDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA & Anr.
- ANNAPU REDDY BALA VENKAT v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- .ANNAPU REDDY BALA VENKAT v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
- Judgment · High Court · 2026
- DEEPAK TALWAR v. INCOM
- DEEPAK TALWAR v. INCOM
- DEEPAK TALWAR v. INCOM
- DEEPAK TALWAR v. INCOM
- DEEPAK TALWAR v. INCOM
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.