L KAPUR

36 indexed judgments · derived from the public court record.

35Supreme Court of India1Bombay High Court

Statutes & acts

Most-cited statutes in judgments bearing this bench:

Indian Penal Code — 22 Code of Criminal Procedure — 13 Evidence Act — 8 Code of Civil Procedure — 8 Contract Act — 4 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 — 3 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — 2 Income Tax Act — 2 Arbitration Act — 2 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — 2

Recent judgments

Associated v. Appeal dismissedSupreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
The ;;~spital v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXBombay High Court
Malanga who was a Ohandala. Vishva Mitra was a v. THE UNION OF INDIASupreme Court of India
ABDUL RAHIM ISMAIL RAHIMTOOLA v. THE STATE OF BOMBAYSupreme Court of India
SUPREME COUR.T REPORTS v. THE STATE OF \VEST BENGALSupreme Court of India
NARAYANDAS BHAGWANDAS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGALSupreme Court of India
4. • [1959] Supp. SAROJ KUMAR MAZUMDAR v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. ReinholdSupreme Court of India
' I959 Ada·r v. Maharaj executed, the amount realised by the execution by the Collector hasSupreme Court of India
[1959] Supp. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE, TRAV ANCORE-COCHIN AND COORO, BANGALORE v. THE INDO MERCANTILE BANK & Ors.Supreme Court of India
I959 Lipton Ltd v. Their Employees · S. K. Das]. 180 SUPitEME .COURT REPOitTS [1959] Supp & Ors.Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
W AMAN SHRINIW AS KINI v. RATILAL BHAGWANDAS & COSupreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
I959 Ranjit Singh v. Tlic State of Punjab J;·apur j. • I959 April 21. [1959] SuppSupreme Court of India
Kolturuswami v. VeeravvaSupreme Court of India
[1959) Supp. I959 The T'atna Electric Supfly Co., Ltd., Patna v. The Patna In fairness to the Tribunals we national economy. oughtSupreme Court of India
Appeal allowed v. Raghunath ilfisraSupreme Court of India
J ayavanlsinhji, Ranmalsinhji v. Th6 Slal6 of BombaySupreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
Narain a,.11 v. The State of PunjabSupreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs v. ITS WORKMEN & Ors.Supreme Court of India
[1959] Supp. x958 v. Teja Singh V enkataram a Aiyar ] . • NovemberSupreme Court of India
Mckenzie 6- Co v. Its Workme11Supreme Court of India
I. T .• Bomb·•Y v. The result is the appeal fails and is dismissed with costsSupreme Court of India
Court thinks it fit and proper to entertain a.n applica v. For the reasons aforesaid, we a.How the appeal, and remit the caseSupreme Court of India
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. M/s. McMILLAN & COSupreme Court of India
Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India
The ;iare of Madras v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGALSupreme Court of India
October 15 v. Their WorknienSupreme Court of India
The State of Bombay v. SaubhagchandSupreme Court of India
V, The E'/ection v. THE STATE OF MADRASSupreme Court of India
THE UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., CALCUTTA v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGALSupreme Court of India
Dase.] v. Statt of UttarSupreme Court of India
K.N.Mehra v. The State of RajasthanSupreme Court of India