✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

ANIRUDDHA ROY2 min read

Judgment

Mr. Debjit Kundu …For Petitioner Mr. Subir Kuma Saha, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Pretom Das … For the State Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on record. The petitioner was an approved Assistant Teacher at a Primary School, District – Kalimpong. He had retired from his employment on 30.9.2022. The Pension Payment Order was issued by the concerned respondent on 01.02.2023. The petitioner had received Pension and gratuity under the Pension Payment Order on 9.3.2023. The petitioner was entitled to pensionary benefit from the date of retirement, the same was not paid. The petitioner now claims interest for the delayed payment of the said gratuity and arrear pension on and from 01.10.2022. 2 Mr. Saha, learned A.G.P. appears for the State / respondents. It is trite that, the pension, which is lawfully payable to an employee is its property and if there is any delay in making such payment and the disbursement thereof in favour of such employee, such an employee is eligible and entitle to receive interest. In view of the above, the respondents and or the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned Treasury Officer are directed to pay interest on the gratuity and arrear pension @ 8% per annum on and from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment being received by the petitioner in terms of the pension payment order. The entire exercise as directed above, shall be carried out and completed positively by the respondents and or the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned Treasury Officer within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. In default, the said arrear amounts and the entitlement of the petitioner shall carry an additional interest of 2% per annum till the date the petitioner actually receives the same. 3 Since affidavits are not called for, allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. On the above terms, this writ petition being WPA 759 of 2023 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.

(ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments