✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

ANIRUDDHA ROY

Judgment

Mr. Hillol Saha Poddar, Mr. Suman Chakraborty.. For the Petitioner. Mr. Hirak Barman, Mr. Momenur Rahaman. For the State. Mr. Hillol Saha Poddar, learned counsel with Suman Chakraborty, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and no further cause survives therein. Mr.Hirak Barman, learned State counsel present. In view of the above, this writ petition being WPA 236 of 2023 stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (ANIRUDDHA ROY,J.) 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments