Rohan v. The Divisional Manager, Oriental
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the appeal, be and the same, is dismissed for default.
Judgment
Mr. Saswata Bhattacharyya. … for the respondents
None appears on behalf of the appellants/claimants.
The respondent/Insurance Company is represented by the learned Advocate.
It appears that the instant appeal is pending since the year 2012.
The instant appeal is preferred at the behest of the appellants challenging the impugned judgment and award dated 30th May, 2012 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, 6th Fast Track Court, Malda in connection with M.A.C. Case no. 123A of 2010 U/S 163 A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. By passing the impugned order, learned Tribunal rejected the claim of the appellants/claimants for getting compensation.
It appears that the appellants/claimants has lost interest to proceed further with this case, as such, there is no justification to keep this case alive in the list.
Accordingly, the appeal, be and the same, is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.