✦ Calcutta High Court

Trends Crest Analytics v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

SUJOY PAUL, PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

2025 is disposed of as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. With the disposal of the instant appeal, the pending application being I.A.No. CAN 1 of 2025 is dismissed.

Judgment

Ms. Kanchan Jaju Ms. Sakshi Singh…………..for the appellant Mr. Chirantan Dawn….for the Union of India Mr. Ujjal Ray………….for the respondent Ms. Anamika Pandey ….for the Election Commission of India DICTATED BY PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.:

1.

At the time of hearing, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant submits before this Court that she has received instruction for withdrawal of the instant appeal.

2.

Other side has no objection.

Operative part

3.

In view of the submissions, as made on behalf of the appellant, F.M.A. 1845 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.

4.

With the disposal of the instant appeal, the pending application being I.A.No. CAN 1 of 2025 is dismissed.

5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the 2 parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.)

(PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments