✦ Calcutta High Court

02.2026 Ct. No.01 RP WPA (P) 235 of 2022 Emadur Rahaman & Anr. v. The Union of India & Ors.

PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. The instant PIL is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail statutory remedy. [SUJOY PAUL, CJ.] [PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.]

Judgment

Mr. Jahar Lal De, Ld. AGP Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee Mr. Suddhadev Adak …..For State PER, SUJOY PAUL, CJ.:

1.

None appears for the petitioners.

2.

The State is represented by learned counsels.

3.

Since nobody entered appearance

06.01.2026, the matter was listed under the heading “For Dismissal”. Nobody appears for the petitioners today also.

4.

Mr. Dey, learned AGP for the State submits that the petitioners have statutory remedy the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, West Bengal, Grievance Redressal Rules, 2009 in respect of the relief claimed by them.

5.

There is nobody to oppose the said contention. 2

6.

The instant PIL is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail statutory remedy. [SUJOY PAUL, CJ.]

[PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.]

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments