Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
bail is rejected
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 304, 308, 323, 326, 341
- Explosive Substance Act, 1908 ss. 3, 4
Judgment
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick .…for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Roy Mr. Amanul Islam …for the State We perused the materials in the case diary. The police case is dated October 6, 2017. There is an issue of long absconsion. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and the prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected. The application being CRM (A) 4974 of 2023 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: bail is rejected
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 304, 308, 323, 326, 341; Explosive Substance Act, 1908 — ss. 3, 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.