Muttappa. Sb. Ramappa Hadhavar v. The State of Karnataka
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 380, 457
- Explosive Substance Act, 1908 s. 5
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In viev of the above lacts. I am of the opinion that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Hence the following order: ORDER The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail subject to the following conditi on s:
Judgment
(By Sri. Anand R. KoHl, Adv.) PETiTIONERS 4 -2- AND: The State of Karnataka S.P.P High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench, Dharwacl (Represented by PSI (Ikal Dist: Bagalkot) (By Sri. Vinavak S. Kulkarni, HCGP) RESPONDENT This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail connection with Crime No.90/2011 in respect accused No.1, 2. 3 & 11 registered before Ilkal P.S. for an offence p/u/s 457 & 380 of IPC &. Sec. 5 of Explosive Substance Act, 1908. This criminal petition coining on ftn orders this day, the Court made the following: - ORDER This petition is seeking bail in Crime No.90/2011 of ilkal Police Station on 05.06.20 1 1 for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 (PC.
It is the case of the prosecution that petitioners had committed theft of property kept in the godown of one Shantaveeravva and that the said property was used in blasting the rocks. The value of -3- the property according to the complainant was worth about Rs. 1,50,000/-. This Court has granted bail to the other accused in Criminal Petition No.10931/2011. Hence these petitioners also stands on par with the said accused.
Heard Sri. Vinayak S. Kulkarni, learned High Court Government Pleader for the State. The learned High Court Government Pleader files statement objections.
Operative part
In viev of the above lacts. I am of the opinion that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Hence the following order: ORDER The petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail subject to the following conditi on s:
The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand a .4. Only) with one surety each for the like sum to the satisfaction to the trial Court.
2. The petitioners are directed to mark their attendance before the Investigating Officer once in a week till charge sheet is filed or till three months whichever is earlier and thereafter, once in a month for six months. Sd/s. JUDe
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 380, 457; Explosive Substance Act, 1908 — s. 5.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.