Rajib Sardar and Anr. v. Banamali Sardar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XLI r. 27
Judgment
of 2025 are disposed of in the light of the above observations.
#23. There will be no order as to costs. 7
#24. The parties shall act on the server copy of this order, duly downloaded from the official website of this court. I agree. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) AD -11 Ct No.16 28.01.2026 (SSS)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XLI r. 27.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 28 Jan 2026. The bench was SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. PROBATE SUIT No. 21 of 2023).
← Search more judgments