✦ Calcutta High Court

No. 208 Ct No. 7 SG WPA 24016 of 2025 Pintu Mondal v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. With the above direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.

Judgment

Mr. A.K. Nag, Mr. P. Banerjee, Ms. R. Sarkar. Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Ms. P. Jana. … for the petitioner … for the State Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das. … for respondent no. 10 Mr. Kapil Ch. Sahoo. Mr. Samar Kr. Gayen. … for respondent nos. 4 - 8

1.

The writ application has been preferred challenging an order dated 23.07.2025 passed in Appeal Case No. 152-157/25 under Section 54 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 passed by the Additional District Magistrate and District Land & Land Reforms Officer, South 24 Parganas at Alipore.

2.

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the respondent that the said order is an appealable order which is admitted by the petitioner who submits that as the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal is not functioning the petitioner could not prefer an appeal. 2

3.

The said contention of the petitioner is not substantiated as the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal is being presided over by regular officers.

4.

Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within 30 days from the date of this order. Period of limitation is extended accordingly in the interest of justice.

Operative part

5.

With the above direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.

6.

Since no affidavits have been filed by the respondents, the allegations made in the writ petition shall not be deemed to have been admitted.

8.

There shall be no order as to costs. Let urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. [Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 — s. 54.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments