✦ Calcutta High Court

02.2025 PG/KS Ct. No.1 W.P.A. (P) 42 of 2025 Ramaprasad Sengupta & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 2

Judgment

Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee Mr. Sk. Md. Galib, Sr. Adv. Ms. Priyamvada Singh ………..for the Petitioners …..for the State

1.

This writ petition has been filed to set aside the notice dated November 6, 2023. However, the said notice has fructified into an order passed by the prescribed authority under Section 51A(4) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 (for brevity, “the Act”).

2.

Aggrieved by such order, the writ petitioners had filed an original application before the West Bengal Land Reforms Act and Tenancy Tribunal under Section 6 read with Section 10 of the State Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunals Act, 1997. The said application is pending.

3.

If such is the factual situation, at this juncture, we cannot test the correctness of the notice issued on November 6, 2023 nor the order dated November 30, 2023 passed by the prescribed authority.

4.

Therefore, the learned Tribunal is at liberty to take up the application filed by the petitioners and proceed to take a decision on merits and in accordance with law.

5.

With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 2

6.

The report submitted by the Assistant Director & Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Murshidabad is kept on record.

7.

It will be open to the petitioners to also seek for appropriate interim orders before the learned Tribunal.

8.

The petitioners are at liberty to request the learned Tribunal for early hearing of the matter.

9.

No costs.

10.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments