Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Anunoy Basu ... for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Kr. Debnath, Mr. Gopal Ch. Das, Mr. Debangshu Mondal … for the KMC Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, Mr. Sabyasachi Mandal, Mr. Sanatan Panja … for the State Mr. Abrotosh Majumdar, Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr. Chayan Gupta, Mr. Sandip Dasgupta, Mr. S. Siddiqui … for the WBHIDCO Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. All parties are present. Learned counsel appearing for the West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited submits that the writ petition may be withdrawn upon recording the stand of the respondent Housing Corporation that the property in question in the writ petition is not a ‘Heritage Building’ within the meaning of The Kolkata Municipal 2 Corporation Act, 1980, as mentioned in the Memo dated 23rd September, 2022. The petitioner does not have any objection to such statement being recorded. WPA 23356 of 2022 is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated and the connected applications, if any, are disposed of. The instruction and the affidavit-in-opposition of the respondent Housing Corporation are taken on record. ( Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.