✦ Calcutta High Court

Shakir Manvi & Anr. v. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

KAUSIK CHANDA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty Mr. Sounak Mondal Ms. Bratati Pramanick ..for the petitioner Mr. Subhrangsu Panda Ms. I. Bhattacharyya ..for KMC The petitioners apprehend that without giving any due notice, the Corporation will demolish the building at premises no.J-206/1, Paharpur Road, Garden Reach, Police Station-Garden Reach, Ward No.133, Borough-XV, Kolkata –700024. The petitioners claim ownership over the said building. Mr. Panda, learned advocate appearing for the Corporation submits that on routine inspection, it was found that though the petitioners obtained a sanctioned plan for a G+5 storeyed building, they made some deviations from the approved construction. Accordingly, the Corporation has issued a stop work notice under Section 400(1) of the Kolkata Municipal 2 Corporation Act, 1980 and sent a proposal to initiate a proceeding for demolition under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Mr. Panda submits that the Corporation has not yet decided under which Section of the said Act of 1980, the demolition proceeding is to be initiated. The proposal is under consideration only. After hearing the parties, I am of the view that the facts and circumstances of the case do not justify invocation of 400(8) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The apprehension of the petitioners is not unjustified. However, the Corporation will be at liberty to initiate the demolition proceedings under Section 400(1) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, if it so thinks, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Accordingly, WPA 23338 of 2024 is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments