✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

SUJOY PAUL, PARTHA SARATHI SEN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

In view of such, contempt petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In our considered view, the petitioner has probably lost his interest to proceed with the instant contempt application and/or the instant contempt application has become infructuous with the passage of time.
  • Para 44. In view of such, contempt petition is dismissed for default.

Judgment

I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2003 (Old No. CAN 1004 of 2003) Smt. Suprova Chatterjee (Mukherjee) Vs. Sri Saidul Haque DICTATED BY PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.:

1.

None appears for the parties.

2.

It is a matter of 2005.

3.

In our considered view, the petitioner has probably lost his interest to proceed with the instant contempt application and/or the instant contempt application has become infructuous with the passage of time.

Operative part

4.

In view of such, contempt petition is dismissed for default.

5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.)

(PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments