02.2026 Ct. 3 AD 9 Saswata WPA 11041 of 2025 Islam Mondal v. State of West Bengal Mr. Chinmoy Pal Ms. Swati Mondal Mr. Sirsanya & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 1010. With the above direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
Judgment
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record.
The instant writ petition has been complaining inaction the part Bidhannagore Municipal Corporation in arresting illegal construction being carried on by respondent no. 10 in respect of Dag no. 3452, Khatian no. 507, Mouza-Gopalpur, J.L. no. 2, ward no. 4.
The petitioner would complain respondent no. 10 who is the adjacent owner of the petitioner’s premises has been carrying out illegal construction without any sanction building plan. Although, a complaint was lodged with the municipal authorities on 9th May 2025, the Municipal authorities had failed to take any steps in this regard.
The Bidhannagore Municipal Corporation and the State are represented.
Insofar as the private respondent concerned, the postal envelop annexed to the 2 affidavit of service would demonstrate that the service on the private respondent has been refused.
Having regard to the aforesaid, I am of the view that instead of calling for a report from the Municipal authorities, it would be prudent at this stage to dispose of the writ petition by directing the Municipal authorities to take steps on the basis of the aforesaid complaint filed by the petitioner and to dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order
upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties.
If, on the basis of the decision to be taken by the Municipal authorities it transpires that any illegal construction has taken place, immediate steps shall be taken under the provisions of Section 266 of the West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006 and the same should be brought to a logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks from the date when the decision in this regard is taken. The entire exercise must be completed within 16 weeks from the date of communication of this order.
The decision as to whether any unauthorized construction has come up, must be taken by the respondents within a period of 4 weeks from date by carrying out an inspection and by retaining photographs of the inspected property in the file.
Since, I have not called for any affidavits, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. 3
Operative part
With the above direction and observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from this Court’s official website. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006 — s. 266.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 09 May 2025. The bench was RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.