✦ Calcutta High Court · 14 Jul 2017

Sri Anup Kumar Biswas, since deceased & Anr. v. Pritha Sarkar & Ors.

DEBANGSU BASAK

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Sri Anup Kumar Biswas, since deceased, represented by Prativa Biswas & Anr. vs. Pritha Sarkar & Ors. Mr. Kaustuv Mishra Mr. Uttam Kumar Bhattacharyya … for the petitioners Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay Mr. Tirthankar Dey Mr. Arka Kumar Nag … for the alleged contemnors Mr. Gopal Chandra Ghosh Mr. Rajkrishna Mondal … for the private respondents. An application for modification of the order dated May 15, 2018 as well as the contempt petition complaining about violation of such order are taken up for analogous consideration in presence of the learned Advocates for the writ petitioner, the municipality as well as the private respondents. The order dated May 15, 2018 proceeded on the basis of allegation of unauthorized construction. The operative portion of such order required the municipal corporation to exercise powers under Section 268 of the West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006 in respect of unauthorized construction as noted in the writing dated July 14, 2017 in accordance with law. 2 The Court is informed that the municipal corporation did take steps. However, the municipal corporation is hindered in view of the Section specified in the order dated May 15, 2018. Hence, the application for modification at the behest of the municipal corporation. As noted above, the order proceeded on the basis of allegation of unauthorized construction. The relevant provision should be Section 266 of the West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006. In such circumstances, the order dated May 15, 2018 passed in the writ petition is modified to mean that the municipal corporation will exercise powers under Section 266 of the Act of 2006 in respect of the unauthorized construction as noted above in the writing dated July 14, 2017 in accordance with law. The time to complete the exercise is extended for a period of six weeks from date. In view of the modification of the order dated May 15, 2018, no order need be passed in the contempt petition. CPAN 10 of 2019 as well as CAN 1 of 2022 and CAN 1 of 2021 are disposed of accordingly. (Debangsu Basak, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006 — ss. 266, 268.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Calcutta High Court, on 14 Jul 2017. The bench was DEBANGSU BASAK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments