CT. NO.19 SL.NO.8 W.P.A No. 2683 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
This writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 s. 12(1)
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Debashis Banerjee Mr. Subrata Saha Mr. A. Biswas ….for the petitioner Mr. L.M. Mahata Mr. P.B. Mahata ..for the State The Pradhan of No.1 Bolla Gram Panchayat has challenged the requisition on the ground that although the signatories of the said requisition mentioned themselves to be the majority members of the said Gram Panchayat, who wanted to remove the Pradhan on the ground of lack of confidence, they were not the majority. The petitioner contends that the prescribed authority could not have acted upon the requisition dated February 3, 2021 and the notice convening the meeting for removal of the Pradhan dated February 8, 2022 ought to be set aside. Prayer is made that the meeting scheduled to be held on February 17, 2022, set aside by this Court on the ground of misstatement of the requisitionists. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that 7 out of 19 members have brought the requisition. They were not the majority and as such, the requisition was brought in violation of the provisions of law. 2 Section 12(1) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973(hereinafter referred to as the said Act) provides that the majority members can remove the Pradhan on the ground of lack of confidence by bringing a motion expressing their willingness to do so. Section 12(2) of the said Act provides that the motion shall be signed by 1/3 of the members but not less than three members. In this case, seven members have brought the motion. The requirement of Section 12(2) of the said Act is satisfied. As there are no further challenges to the requisition and the notice convening the meeting, the writ petition is not entertained. Removal ought to be by the majority but the requisition need not be by the majority. This writ petition is dismissed. There will be, however, no order as to costs. The meeting shall be held as per schedule Parties are to act on the server copy of this order. Parties are to act on the learned advocate’s communication. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 — s. 12(1).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.