✦ Calcutta High Court

Court v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL MR. MD. JALALUDDIN, ADVOCATE & Ors.

REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the afore-stated direction, WPA 210 of 2025 is disposed of.

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 210 OF 2025 M/S. SAHARIA UDDIN SAW MILL VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. MR. MD. JALALUDDIN, ADVOCATE MR. SYED NASIRUL HAQUE, ADVOCATE ……for the Petitioner MR. BISWABRATA BASU MALLICK, LD. AGP MS. PARNA ROY CHOUDHURY, ADVOCATE MS. TRISA CHANDA, ADVOCATE MR. SOUMYA MUKHERJEE, ADVOCATE …..for the State ……for the WBPCB

1.

Affidavit of service as filed, be kept with the record.

2.

The petitioner had applied for issuance of a license for setting up a Secondary Saw Mill using wooden-beam as raw material. For the afore-stated purpose, the petitioner had made requisite payments and also made a representation on

12.06.2024. Presently, the petitioner submits representation made by him be considered within a reasonable time.

3.

Mr. Basu Mallick, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State-Respondent has no objection to such prayer.

4.

Let the respondent no. 3, the concerned authority, consider the representation dated 12.06.2024 and dispose of the same by 10.12.2025, intimating result of representation to the petitioner within a week from passing any order on such representation.

5.

Needless to mention, I have not gone into the merit of the case and all points are kept open to be considered by the respondent no. 3.

6.

With the afore-stated direction, WPA 210 of 2025 is disposed of.

7.

There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

8.

Urgent Photostat Certified Copy of this order be given to the parties, if applied for. (REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.) P a g e | 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments