Court v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL MR. KAUSHIK MODAK, ADVOCATE & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view thereof, WPA 24356 of 2025 is dismissed without any order as to costs. (REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 24356 OF 2025 SUBRATA MULLICK VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. MR. KAUSHIK MODAK, ADVOCATE MS. MOUSUMI PAL, ADVOCATE MR. MUSTAFI RAHMAN, ADVOCATE MR. SUBHAM BANIK, ADVOCATE MR. JAYANTA SAMANTA, ADVOCATE ……for the Petitioner ……for the State
The petitioner seeks to challenge an order passed by the respondent no. 2, in an application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (the SARFAESI Act).
The remedy of the petitioner lies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, the same being an alternative and efficacious remedy available to the petitioner.
In view thereof, WPA 24356 of 2025 is dismissed without any order as to costs.
(REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.