Seedgrow Agri Genetics Thru. Prop v. The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ss. 138, 143(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed 2 A483 No. 1107 of 2025 to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law, without granting…
- Para 55. This application stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Sachin (Brij Raj Singh,J.) SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court of Judicial Magistrate-III, Lucknow, to decide the Case no.127604 of 2023 (Seedgrow Agri Gentics Vs. Rajesh Singh, Proprietor, M/s. Kisan Agro Traders, Gola Ghat, Opp. Gomti Hospital, Faizabad Road, District Sultanpur, U.P. 228001) filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.
The aforesaid case of the applicant is pending since 2023. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress.
In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed 2 A483 No. 1107 of 2025 to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to the parties.
Operative part
This application stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Sachin (Brij Raj Singh,J.) SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — ss. 138, 143(3).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.