Mo. Husain v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The instant petition lacks merit and the same is dismissed. November 15, 2025 Pradeep/- (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard Sri Shankar Lal Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Seema Dixit, the learned Standing Counsel.
By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Court No. 13, Barabanki to decide Original Suit No. 433 of 2015 (Mohammad Husain v. Kamaruddin & Ors., expeditiously.
The State of U.P. is not a party to the suit and, therefore, it is neither necessary nor a proper party to the petition and the petition suffers from the defect of mis-joinder of parties. The petitioner has not annexed the entire order sheet along with the petition and from the copies of the orders annexed it appears that issues were framed by the trial court on 18.12.2015. The last order on 25.09.2024, the court was vacant and on
30.04.2025, the parties were absent. No order passed after
30.04.2025 has been annexed with the petition.
In these circumstances, no good ground has been made out for issuing any direction to the trial court. 2 A227 No. 6667 of 2025
The instant petition lacks merit and the same is dismissed. November 15, 2025 Pradeep/- (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.