Kabutara v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 Ashutosh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that the private opposite parties are obstructing in the construction proposed to be raised.
Without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, as the petitioner has moved an application under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the said application shall be decided by respondent No.2 in accordance with law.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim of the petitioner.
Operative part
The petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 Ashutosh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.