CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 11559 of 2025 · Allahabad High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PANKAJ BHATIA
Outcome
Allowed
application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 64(1), 70(1), 115(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the facts and circumstances and considering that the applicant has been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 14.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged. In view…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 298 of 2025, under Sections 70(1) BNS, P.S. Bheera, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant Awdhesh @ Awadhesh Kumar has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 9.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9425 of 2025 under Sections 64(1) and 115(2) BNS and the instant application has been filed seeking bail in newly added Section 70(1) BNS.
Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
Operative part
Considering the facts and circumstances and considering that the applicant has been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 14.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
Let the applicant Awdhesh @ Awadhesh Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; 2 BAIL No. 11559 of 2025 (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
The sureties furnished earlier shall be valid for this case also. November 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar (Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 64(1), 70(1), 115(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.