Akhand Prakash v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jul 2025
- Bench
- RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC-LKO:41538-DB
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Suchiti Chandra, learned counsel for opposite party no.4. The petitioner's challenge to an award/ order determining compensation payable for his land acquired under National Highways Act, 1956 has been decided by the arbitrator under Section 3(g)(v) on 08.04.2025. This petition has been filed challenging it whereas there is a remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to pursue the remedies prescribed. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Shanu/- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
National Highways Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 21 Jul 2025. The bench was RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.