Judgment · High Court · 2005
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. S.G. Bhobe, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, with Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE, J. DATE : 21st April, 2005. P.C. Heard Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Nadkar ni, with Mr. Naik, learned Counsel for the responde n t. This is an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appoint m e n t of an Arbitrator in respect of the dispute s that have arisen between the parties, purs u a n t to the 2 agreemen t dated 10.11.2 00 0.
J ustice G.D. Kamat, Retired Chief Ju s tice of Gujarat High Court is appointed as an Arbitrator in respect of the dispute s have arisen between the parties. Needless to mention that the respon de n t will be at liberty to raise all the contention s before the learned Arbitrator. The applica nt to deposit proces sing fee of Rs.5,00 0 / - within a period of two weeks today. Application stan d s disposed of. A.P. LAVANDE, J. ssm.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 21 Apr 2005. The bench was A P LAVANDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.