✦ Jharkhand High Court

Suraj Kumar Singh @ Suraj Kumar v. Opp. Party

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner For the Opp. Party : Mr. N.K. Chatterjee : Mr. Suchendra Prasad, A.P.P. ........ 4/16.09.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Suraj Kumar Singh @ Suraj Kumar is moved by Sri N.K. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Suchendra Prasad, learned Additional PP. Petitioner implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Vikash Kumar Singh. There is no direct evidence against him. Antecedent report at flag-R shows that petitioner has no criminal history. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 25th of September 2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 837 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4258 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Binit (Prashant Kumar, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. RANCHI A. B. A No. 538 of 2013). ← Search more judgments