Triveni Singh v. Senior Registrar, High Court Allahabad Bench Lko
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 05 Mar 2025
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC-LKO:13444-DB
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Santosh/- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Petitioner :- Triveni Singh Respondent :- Senior Registrar, High Court Allahabad Bench Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajat Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Gaurav Mehrotra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard.
The petitioner, it appears, was a party in some arbitration proceedings conducted by an Arbitrator appointed by the High Court under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Now, he wants certified copy of the award from the opposite parties, but, the Arbitrator is not a party here. Senior Registrar of the High Court and other Officials are parties.
We fail to understand as to how the certified copy of an award rendered by an Arbitrator can be given by the High Court. The petitioner may approach the Arbitrator by moving an application seeking a signed copy of the award which the Arbitrator is obliged to provide under Section 31 (5) of the Act, 1996.
Operative part
The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Santosh/- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 05 Mar 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.