Smt. Shakuntala & Anr. v. S.P. Singh
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. November 7, 2025 Anupam S/- (Prashant Kumar,J.) ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Judgment
Smt. Shakuntala And Anr. Rinku Bhatia And Anr. Counsel for Appellant(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) Court No. - 21 Versus .....Appellant(s) .....Respondent(s) S.P. Singh : : HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
#1. Case called out in the revised call.
#2. None is present for the appellant(s) when the case is taken up for hearing and there is no request for adjournment/pass-over made on behalf of the appellant(s).
#3. It appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2003, appellant(s) has lost his interest in pursuing this case and therefore, by efflux of time, the appeal appears to have become infructuous.
#4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. November 7, 2025 Anupam S/- (Prashant Kumar,J.) ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.