Nepal Singh v. Santosh Kumar Singh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall clear the entire arrears due, within a period of five months i.e. not later than 15.03.2026. (ii) In discharge of dues, the petitioner shall deposit, by way of first…
Judgment
#1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arvind Singh learned counsel for the respondent bank and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
#2. Petitioner has committed default in repayment of secured debt to the respondent-Bank. Bank has initiated proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. However, no auction has taken place and third party rights have not intervened.
#3. At the outset, petitioner has offered to pay the outstanding amount Rs. 10,81,000/- together with entire interest due, within a period of five months. This offer has been accepted by learned counsel for the respondent - Bank.
#4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall clear the entire arrears due, within a period of five months i.e. not later than 15.03.2026. (ii) In discharge of dues, the petitioner shall deposit, by way of first installment, a sum of Rs. 2,81,000/- with the respondent - Bank, on or before 15 November 2025. (iii) Upon deposit of Rs. 2,81,000 /- by the petitioner, the respondent - Bank 2 WRIC No. 35836 of 2025 shall immediately communicate to the petitioner the exact amount being claimed from him including interest computation up to February 2026 (on reducing balance). (iv) Petitioner shall thereafter deposit the remaining amount in four equal monthly installments of Rs. 2,00,000 /- each payable on or before 15 December 2025, 15 January 2026, 15 February 2026 and 15 March 2026 respectively. (v) The amount of interest being claimed by the respondent - Bank may be paid, by way of last installment, on or before 15 March 2026.
#5. Subject to the continued compliance of the order being made by the petitioner, the auction proceedings may be kept in abeyance so however that the attachment shall continue but the secured asset may not be auctioned and physical possession may not be altered.
#6. Any amount that may have been deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the impugned demand notice, may be adjusted against the deposit to be made under this order.
#7. In case of default of any of the conditions as mentioned above, the present order shall stand automatically vacated and recovery proceedings shall revive from that stage.
#8. Petitioner undertakes to abide by the terms of this order and not to press his objections and statutory proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. October 14, 2025 Faraz (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 15 Nov 2025. The bench was SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, INDRAJEET SHUKLA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.