Shivnath v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall clear the entire arrears due, within a period of four months i.e. not later than 28 February 2026. (ii) In discharge of dues, the petitioner shall deposit, by way…
Judgment
: Madan Mohan Srivastava : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
#1. Heard Sri Madan Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent - Bank.
#2. Petitioner has committed default in repayment of secured debt to the respondent-Bank. Bank has initiated proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. However, no auction has taken place.
#3. At the outset, petitioner has offered to pay the outstanding amount Rs. 10 ,78,071.17/- together with entire interest due, within a period of four months. This offer has been accepted by learned counsel for the respondent - Bank.
#4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall clear the entire arrears due, within a period of four months i.e. not later than 28 February 2026. (ii) In discharge of dues, the petitioner shall deposit, by way of first installment, a sum of Rs. 2,78,071.17/- with the respondent - Bank, on or before 31 October 2025. (iii) Upon deposit of Rs. 2,78,071.17/- by the petitioner, the respondent - Bank shall immediately communicate to the petitioner the exact amount being claimed from him including interest computation upto January, 2026 2 WRIC No. 33159 of 2025 (on reducing balance). (iv) Petitioner shall thereafter deposit three installments of Rs. 2,00,000/- each payable on or before 30 November 2025, 31 December 2025 and 31 January 2026. (v) The remaining amount together with interest claimed by the respondent - Bank may be paid, by way of last installment, on or before 28 February
#5. Subject to continued compliance of this order being made by the petitioner, the auction proceedings may be kept in abeyance so however that the attachment shall continue but the secured asset may not be auctioned and physical possession may not be disturbed.
#6. Any other amount that may have been deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the impugned demand notice, may be adjusted against the last deposit to be made under this order.
#7. Subject to full compliance being made by the petitioner to the terms of this order, no further amount can be recovered from the petitioner either by way of legal expense and other charges as the entire amount has been paid under the directions issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. October 7, 2025 Abhilash (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the following
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002; Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 28 Feb 2026. The bench was SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, INDRAJEET SHUKLA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.